From West's summary of a contract dispute case
"[T]trial court's admission of irrelevant testimony that seller refused to aid a sick baby was harmless error."
So thinks the court! If the seller can't even help a sick baby, why would it blink at breaching a contract? How's *that* for legal reasoning??
(Is Harriet looking? Maybe she'll let me clerk!)
posted by Law Fairy @ 6:40 PM
1 comments
1 Comments:
Hmmmm... how did you know I have a hot body?
Anyway, when you sleep around as much as I do, neck-down only is no way to guarantee I won't be discovered (Ohh! I burned myself!!)
Post a Comment
<< Home