Tuesday, October 25, 2005

From West's summary of a contract dispute case

"[T]trial court's admission of irrelevant testimony that seller refused to aid a sick baby was harmless error."

So thinks the court! If the seller can't even help a sick baby, why would it blink at breaching a contract? How's *that* for legal reasoning??

(Is Harriet looking? Maybe she'll let me clerk!)


At October 26, 2005 at 2:23 PM, Blogger Jeremy said...

Why don't you post some pictures of your hot body?

Neck down will do, since you don't want to get discovered.

At October 26, 2005 at 2:32 PM, Blogger The Law Fairy said...

Hmmmm... how did you know I have a hot body?

Anyway, when you sleep around as much as I do, neck-down only is no way to guarantee I won't be discovered (Ohh! I burned myself!!)


Post a Comment

<< Home