Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Gandalf the Black?

As if we needed further proof that dogs freaking RULE.

Labels: ,

15 Comments:

At March 20, 2007 at 2:03 PM, Blogger heartinsanfrancisco said...

It's a great story. Many of my best friends have been dogs, and I have always believed that they give far more than they get.

 
At March 20, 2007 at 2:39 PM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

I've always been a big fan of animals and nature. We can learn a lot just by watching them day in and day out. My next house is going to be away from urban areas. I want to get a peregrine falcon and watch that little of a miracle stoop at about 200mph.

 
At March 21, 2007 at 12:18 PM, Blogger The Law Fairy said...

hearts, you and I have talked before about our mutual love for dogs. I tend to be more implicitly trusting of dog people (and I mean, not as opposed to cat people, but as opposed to people who don't understand that pets really are FAMILY MEMBERS). If someone doesn't love dogs... I really have to wonder why.

knights, a falcon, huh? I remember going to USAFA football games and they always had the falcon trainers let the birds loose at either the beginning or halftime. It's crazy the speed those birds can get.

 
At March 21, 2007 at 1:13 PM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

"knights, a falcon, huh?"

LF, I have a new love. :) That bird is so amazing.

 
At March 21, 2007 at 7:48 PM, Blogger heartinsanfrancisco said...

Hey, c'mon over, LF. My latest rant is about our fine and loyal friends.

I love all animals, but consider myself primarily a dog person. It feels very strange and definitely wrong that I don't have one at the moment, but we live in a small apartment which (a) does not allow pets (our cat is bootlegged, not possible with someone who barks) and (b) would be unfair to a dog.

So it really pisses me off when I see people abusing and neglecting those mostly angelic beings.

 
At March 22, 2007 at 12:10 PM, Blogger Katie said...

You've got a blog!

You've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog, you've got a blog.

Hooray!

(This is the first time I've seen you link to it from Feministing. You're one of my favorite commenters on the internet.)

 
At March 22, 2007 at 1:09 PM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

"(This is the first time I've seen you link to it from Feministing. You're one of my favorite commenters on the internet.) "

Hmm....there is something attractive about law people. My favourite commenter was a lawyer from Connecticut (works in New York). He was my mentor.

 
At March 22, 2007 at 4:40 PM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

By the way: you are not the same katie from that lesbian site, are you?

 
At March 23, 2007 at 6:58 AM, Blogger Katie said...

What on EARTH is "that lesbian site?" Is there only 1? *confused* Anyway, no, I don't frequent any lesbian sites at the moment...

 
At March 23, 2007 at 9:07 AM, Blogger The Law Fairy said...

katie, aww, thanks! And thanks for visiting!

knights, you've been to feministing, you know it's not a lesbian site.

 
At March 23, 2007 at 4:30 PM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

"knights, you've been to feministing, you know it's not a lesbian site. "

Yeah, most of them seem to think religious people are idiots and they are the enlightened ones. *eye roll*

The author/administrator whatever her name is, is hell bent on equal rights and for women's voices to be heard but is so quick to cut off any speech that isn't inline with the rest of the orgy. :) lol

It's sooo lesbian......you gotta admit LF.

 
At March 23, 2007 at 4:41 PM, Blogger The Law Fairy said...

knights, first of all, your use of "lesbian" as a perjorative denomination is rude and demeaning.

Second, stereotype much? An "orgy"? I know I haven't slept with any other commenters. And does subtlety escape you? Lots of people disagree about lots of things on the board. Oh, but I guess that when almost everyone is pro-women's rights, that's way too much consensus. Better to meet in the "middle ground," right? Maybe women should just count as 3/5 of a person.

Third, I'm very religious, and openly so at feministing, and only one or two commenters have ever had an issue with this. So if you read into the comments an anti-religious slant, it's coming from you and your own biases.

 
At March 23, 2007 at 4:57 PM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

"knights, first of all, your use of "lesbian" as a perjorative denomination is rude and demeaning."

We all identify ourselves in denominations of certain kind. Most of us are proud to do so.

" Second, stereotype much? An "orgy"? I know I haven't slept with any other commenters. And does subtlety escape you? Lots of people disagree about lots of things on the board."

It was directed at the discussion part. Most of the commenters are inline with everyone else and if someone is not inline they are cut off.

"Maybe women should just count as 3/5 of a person."

Is there a 3/5 of a person that is capable of functioning?
Where do you get that I count certain people as 3/5?

 
At March 24, 2007 at 5:15 AM, Blogger Andy said...

I thought seriously about naming my cat Galadriel, but Starbuck seemed to fit better.

Knights, for the record, I know a lot of religious lesbians.

 
At March 25, 2007 at 6:37 AM, Anonymous knights13_ghost said...

Andy, I know one religious (catholic) gay person. He just came out of the closet as they would say. I would say they are religious to an extent. I'm not religious too, I just drank 10 beers last night.

Very disappointing though. :(

 

Post a Comment

<< Home